LibrePlanet schedule generator ============================== Installation ------------ On a Debian based distribution, do:: # aptitude install virtualenv python-setuptools Install globally ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :: $ sudo pip install --pre lpschedule-generator Install locally using virtualenv (Recommended) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Make a separate ``lpschedule-generator`` directory and initialize the virtual environment in it:: $ mkdir lpschedule-generator $ cd lpschedule-generator $ virtualenv . $ source bin/activate Install ``lpschedule-generator`` inside this directory using ``pip``:: $ pip install --pre lpschedule-generator Activating virtual environment `````````````````````````````` Always activate the virtual environment before using the ``lps_gen`` command:: $ cd path/to/lpschedule-generator $ source bin/activate Usage ----- :: $ lps_gen YEAR path/to/lp-sch.md > path/to/program-schedule.html Replace ``YEAR`` with LP year; for example, for generating LP 2016 schedule, the command will be:: $ lps_gen 2016 path/to/lp-sch.md > path/to/program-schedule.html LP schedule markdown structure ------------------------------ Overall structure:: ## Day 1 ### Timeslot 1 #### Session 1 #### Session 2 ... ### Timeslot 2 #### Session 1 #### Session 2 ... ## Day 2 ### Timeslot 1 #### Session 1 #### Session 2 ... Session structure:: #### Fork and ignore: fighting a GPL violation by coding instead [Bradley Kuhn][kuhn], [Karen Sandler][sandler] Room 32-155 Typically, GPL enforcement activity involves copyright infringement actions which compel license violators to correct errors in their GPL compliance, defending the policy goals of the GPL: the rights of developers and users to copy, share, modify and redistribute. While traditional enforcement is often undeniably necessary for embedded electronics products, novel approaches to GPL violations are often possible and even superior for more traditional software distributions. Recently, [Software Freedom Conservancy][sfc] engaged in an enforcement action whereby, rather than fight the violator in court, we instead provided resources and assistance to a vetted GPL-compliant fork of a violating codebase. This talk discusses which scenarios make this remedy optimal and the lessons learned. The talk includes some licensing and technical content about vetting the licensing information of codebases. [kuhn]: https://libreplanet.org/YEAR/path/to/speakers.html#kuhn [sandler]: https://libreplanet.org/YEAR/path/to/speakers.html#sandler [sfc]: https://sfconservancy.org/ Sample: https://notabug.org/rsd/lpschedule-generator/raw/dev/tests/files/lp-sch.md Source ------ :: $ git clone https://notabug.org/rsd/lpschedule-generator.git