summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRavi Dwivedi <ravi@anche.no>2021-03-14 05:32:00 +0100
committerRavi Dwivedi <ravi@anche.no>2021-03-14 05:32:00 +0100
commit873164719db5b719e2d442dc4f9564db15b0bc10 (patch)
tree7131a9eec8c635fee089e935fd5e149b95d9e467
parentdaaaa198e712f12ea6c8afc4af25367af87ab8a1 (diff)
Update educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md
-rw-r--r--md/article/educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/md/article/educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md b/md/article/educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md
index bd2d336..1e83675 100644
--- a/md/article/educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md
+++ b/md/article/educational-institutes-should-use-free-software.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Educational Institutes should use exclusively freedom-respecting software
We urge educational institutes to [use free (as in freedom)/swatantra software that respects students' freedom and
-privacy ][fsw-edu]. For example, the Department of Scientific Computing, Modeling, and
+privacy][fsw-edu]. For example, the Department of Scientific Computing, Modeling, and
Simulation, Savitribai Phule Pune University [has been using
free/swantra software tools for more than 20 years and it's currently
helping other departments at Savitribai Phule Pune University adopt
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ privacy ][fsw-edu]. For example, the Department of Scientific Computing, Modelin
Free/Swatantra software means that you, as user, have [the freedom to run, study, modify, and redistribute
the program].
-(See the [free software definition]<https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>.) With these freedoms, the users (both individually and collectively)
+(See the [free software definition] <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>.) With these freedoms, the users (both individually and collectively)
control the program and what it does for them. When users don't control the program, we call it a “nonfree” or “proprietary” program. Proprietary software is an injustice to the user because it
puts its developer or owner in a position of power over its users
<https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html>. They